“Substantial and worthy piece of research . . . excellent in both content and presentation . . . an original contribution to the study of Oneness Pentecostalism . . . an important contribution. One of the hoped–for outcomes of this study is that it will assist a minority tradition within the UPC to regain its forgotten and suppressed voice . . .”

David A. Reed
Wycliffe College, Toronto

“This work reveals . . . the [UPC’s] inner core of teachings, and its divergence from mainline Protestant and Pentecostal . . . cross–centered soteriology. I know of no earlier volume that makes this distinction so clearly and effectively. . . [the] scholarship is very sound . . . fully documented . . . unusually well–written . . . Because this seems to be the first truly scholarly book in its field, it stands without antecedent or peer.”

Stanley M. Burgess
Southwest Missouri State University

“Fudge has succeeded in presenting a total picture of the doctrinal struggle . . . he is to be applauded for his meticulous research of the oral sources. He maintains objectivity in his critical perusal of the subject matter . . . development of the arguments is sound and impressive … makes a significant contribution to the knowledge and understanding of Pentecostalism.”

Ignatius G. Lemmer du Plessis
University of Pretoria, South Africa

“Comprehensive coverage of the literature on the Oneness Pentecostal movement . . . contributes significantly to knowledge of Oneness Pentecostal soteriology . . . .”

Brett Knowles
Otago University, New Zealand

“Well-researched and balanced . . . an admirable job of tracing the tensions between the PCI and the PAJC . . . this will be a very important contribution to the history of the Oneness Pentecostal Movement . . .”

Daniel J. Lewis
William Tyndale College